Forensic dentistry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Categories: Dentistry stubs | Law enforcement stubs | Forensics stubs | Forensics | Dentistry branches
Forensic dentistry or forensic odontology is the proper handling, examination and evaluation of dental evidence, which will be then presented in the interest of justice. The evidence that may be derived from teeth, is the age (in children) and identification of the person to whom the teeth belong. This is done using dental records or ante-mortem (prior to death) photographs. Forensic odontology is derived from latin, meaning forum or where legal matters are disscused. the first forensic dentist in the United States was Dr. Paul Revere who was known for the identification of fallen revolutionary soldiers. The other type of evidence is that of bite marks, left on either the victim (by the attacker), the perpetrator (from the victim of an attack), or on an object found at the crime scene. Bite marks are often found on children who are abused. Forensic dentists are responsible for six main areas of practice:
High-profile criminal casesForensic odontology has played a key role in famous criminal cases:
CriticismRecently, the scientific foundation of forensic odontology, and especially bite mark comparison, has been called into question. A 1999 study by a member of the American Board of Forensic Odontology found a 63 percent rate of false identifications.[1] An investigative series by the Chicago Tribune entitled "Forensics under the Microscope" examined many forensic science disciplines to see if they truly deserve the air of infallibility that has come to surround them. The investigators concluded that bite mark comparison is always subjective and no standards for comparison have been accepted across the field. The journalists discovered that no rigorous experimentation has been conducted to determine error rates for bite mark comparison, a key part of the scientific method. Critics of bite mark comparison cite the case of Ray Krone, an Arizona man convicted of murder on bite mark evidence left on a woman's breast. DNA evidence later implicated another man and Krone was released from prison.[2] Similarly, Roy Brown was convicted of murder due in part to bite-mark evidence, and freed after DNA testing of the saliva left in the bite wounds matched someone else.[1] Notes
External links
Image:Nuvola apps agent.png This law enforcement-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Image:Magnifying glass 01.svg This forensics-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


