Magnetostatics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Magnetostatics is the study of static magnetic fields. In electrostatics, the charges are stationary, whereas here, the currents are stationary or dc(direct current). As it turns out magnetostatics is a good approximation even when the currents are not static as long as the currents do not alternate rapidly.
ApplicationsMagnetostatics as a special case of Maxwell's equationsStarting from Maxwell's equations, the following simplifications can be made:
The quality of this approximation may be guessed by comparing the above equations with the full version of Maxwell's equations and considering the importance of the terms that have been removed. Of particular significance is the comparison of the Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{J}
term against the Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{\partial \vec{D}} {\partial t}
term. If the Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{J}
term is substantially larger, then the smaller term may be ignored without significant loss of accuracy.
Re-introducing Faraday's lawA common technique is to solve a series of magnetostatic problems at incremental time steps and then use these solutions to approximate the term Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{\partial \vec{B}} {\partial t} . Plugging this result into Faraday's Law finds a value for Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{E} (which had previously been ignored). This method is not a true solution of Maxwell's equations but can provide a good approximation for slowly changing fields. Solving magnetostatic problemsIf all currents in a system are known (i.e. if a complete description of Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{J} is available) then the magnetic field can be determined from the currents by the Biot-Savart equation: Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{B}= \frac{\mu_{0}}{4\pi} \int{\frac{\mathrm{d}\vec{I} \times \hat{r}}{r^2}}
One pitfall in the use of the Biot-Savart equation is that it does not implicitly enforce Gauss's law for magnetism so it is possible to come up with an answer that includes magnetic monopoles. This will occur if some section of the current path has not been included in the integral (implying that electrons are being continuously created in one place and destroyed in another). Using Biot-Savart in the presence of Ferromagnetic, Ferrimagnetic or Paramagnetic materials is difficult because the external current induces a surface current in the magnetic material which in turn must be included in the integral. The value of the surface current depends on the magnetic field which was what you were trying to calculate in the first place. For these problems, using Ampère's law (usually in integral form) is a better choice. For problems where the dominant magnetic material is a highly permeable magnetic core with relatively small air gaps, a magnetic circuit approach is useful. When the air gaps are large in comparison to the magnetic circuit length, fringing becomes significant and usually requires a finite element calculation. The finite element calculation uses a modified form of the magnetostatic equations above in order to calculate magnetic potential. The value of Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \vec{B} can be found from the magnetic potential.ca:Magnetostàtica cs:Magnetostatika de:Magnetostatik el:Μαγνητοστατική fr:Magnétostatique pt:Magnetostática ru:Магнитостатика sk:Magnetostatika |


