首页 | 主题 | 图库 | 问答 | 文摘 | 原创 | 百科

历史 | 地理 | 人物 | 艺术 | 体育 | 科学 | 音乐 | 电影 | 信息技术 | 世界遗产

 开放、中立,源自维基百科

Personal tools

Quadratic equation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In mathematics, a quadratic equation is a polynomial equation of the second degree. The general form is

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c=0,\,\!


where a ≠ 0. (For a = 0, the equation becomes a linear equation.)

The letters a, b, and c are called coefficients: the quadratic coefficient a is the coefficient of Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2 , the linear coefficient b is the coefficient of x, and c is the constant coefficient, also called the free term or constant term.

Quadratic equations are called quadratic because quadratus is Latin for "square"; in the leading term the variable is squared.

Image:Quadratic equation coefficients.png
Plots of real-valued quadratic function ax2 + bx + c, varying each coefficient separately

Contents

Quadratic formula

A quadratic equation with real or complex coefficients has two (not necessarily distinct) solutions, called roots, which may be real or complex, given by the quadratic formula:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a},


where the symbol "±" indicates that both

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_+ = \frac{-b + \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a} and Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \ x_- = \frac{-b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a}

are solutions.

Simply put, ± means 'plus or minus' as equation possibilities.

Discriminant

Image:Quadratic equation discriminant.png
Example discriminant signs
<0: x2+12
=0: −43x2+43x13
>0: 32x2+12x43

In the above formula, the expression underneath the square root sign:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \Delta = b^2 - 4ac , \,\!

is called the discriminant of the quadratic equation.


A quadratic equation with real coefficients can have either one or two distinct real roots, or two distinct complex roots. In this case the discriminant determines the number and nature of the roots. There are three cases:

  • If the discriminant is positive, there are two distinct roots, both of which are real numbers. For quadratic equations with integer coefficients, if the discriminant is a perfect square, then the roots are rational numbers—in other cases they may be quadratic irrationals.
  • If the discriminant is zero, there is exactly one distinct root, and that root is a real number. Sometimes called a double root, its value is:
    Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x = -\frac{b}{2a} . \,\!
  • If the discriminant is negative, there are no real roots. Rather, there are two distinct (non-real) complex roots, which are complex conjugates of each other:
    Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \begin{align} x &= \frac{-b}{2a} + i \frac{\sqrt {4ac - b^2}}{2a} , \\ x &= \frac{-b}{2a} - i \frac{\sqrt {4ac - b^2}}{2a} , \\ i^2 &= -1. \end{align}


Thus the roots are distinct if and only if the discriminant is non-zero, and the roots are real if and only if the discriminant is non-negative.

Geometry

For the quadratic function:   f (x) = x2 − x − 2 = (x + 1)(x − 2) of a real variable x, the x-coordinates of the points where the graph intersects the x-axis, x = −1 and x = 2, are the roots of the quadratic equation: x2 − x − 2 = 0.
For the quadratic function:
f (x) = x2x − 2 = (x + 1)(x − 2) of a real variable x, the x-coordinates of the points where the graph intersects the x-axis, x = −1 and x = 2, are the roots of the quadratic equation: x2x − 2 = 0.

The roots of the quadratic equation

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c=0,\,


are also the zeros of the quadratic function:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): f(x) = ax^2+bx+c,\,


since they are the values of x for which

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): f(x) = 0.\,


If a, b, and c are real numbers, and the domain of f is the set of real numbers, then the zeros of f are exactly the x-coordinates of the points where the graph touches the x-axis.

It follows from the above that, if the discriminant is positive, the graph touches the x-axis at two points, if zero, the graph touches at one point, and if negative, the graph does not touch the x-axis.

Quadratic factorization

The term

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x - r\,


is a factor of the polynomial

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c, \


if and only if r is a root of the quadratic equation

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c=0. \


It follows from the quadratic formula that

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c = a \left( x - \frac{-b + \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a} \right) \left( x - \frac{-b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a} \right).


In the special case where the quadratic has only one distinct root (i.e. the discriminant is zero), the quadratic polynomial can be factored as

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c = a \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2.\,\!


Application to higher-degree equations

Certain higher-degree equations can be brought into quadratic form and solved that way. For example, the 6th-degree equation in x:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^6 - 4x^3 + 8 = 0\,

can be rewritten as:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): (x^3)^2 - 4(x^3) + 8 = 0\,,

or, equivalently, as a quadratic equation in a new variable u:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): u^2 - 4u + 8 = 0,\,

where

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): u = x^3.\,

Solving the quadratic equation for u results in the two solutions:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): u = 2 \pm 2i.

Thus

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^3 = 2 \pm 2i\,.

Concentrating on finding the three cube roots of 2 + 2i – the other three solutions for x will be their complex conjugates – rewriting the right-hand side using Euler's formula:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^3 = 2^{\tfrac{3}{2}}e^{\tfrac{1}{4}\pi i} = 2^{\tfrac{3}{2}}e^{\tfrac{8k+1}{4}\pi i}\,

(since e2kπi = 1), gives the three solutions:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x = 2^{\tfrac{1}{2}}e^{\tfrac{8k+1}{12}\pi i}\,,~k = 0, 1, 2\,.

Using Eulers' formula again together with trigonometric identities such as cos(π/12) = (√2 + √6) / 4, and adding the complex conjugates, gives the complete collection of solutions as:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_{1,2} = -1 \pm i,\,
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_{3,4} = \frac{1 + \sqrt{3}}{2} \pm \frac{1 - \sqrt{3}}{2}i\,

and

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_{5,6} = \frac{1 - \sqrt{3}}{2} \pm \frac{1 + \sqrt{3}}{2}i.\,


History

The Babylonians, as early as 1800 BC (displayed on Old Babylonian clay tablets) could solve a pair of simultaneous equations of the form:

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x+y=p,\ \ xy=q \


which are equivalent to the equation:[1]

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \ x^2+q=px


The original pair of equations were solved as follows:

  1. Form Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{x+y}{2}
  1. Form Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)^2
  1. Form Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)^2 - xy
  1. Form Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \sqrt{\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)^2 - xy} = \frac{x-y}{2}
  1. Find Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x,\ y
by inspection of the values in (1) and (4).[2]

In the Sulba Sutras in ancient India circa 8th century BCE quadratic equations of the form ax2 = c and ax2 + bx = c were explored using geometric methods. Babylonian mathematicians from circa 400 BCE and Chinese mathematicians from circa 200 BCE used the method of completing the square to solve quadratic equations with positive roots, but did not have a general formula. Euclid, the Greek mathematician, produced a more abstract geometrical method around 300 BCE.
In 628 CE, Brahmagupta gave the first explicit (although still not completely general) solution of the quadratic equation:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \ ax^2+bx=c



To the absolute number multiplied by four times the [coefficient of the] square, add the square of the [coefficient of the] middle term; the square root of the same, less the [coefficient of the] middle term, being divided by twice the [coefficient of the] square is the value. (Brahmasphutasiddhanta (Colebrook translation, 1817, page 346)[2]


This is equivalent to:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x = \frac{\sqrt{4ac+b^2}-b}{2a}




The Bakhshali Manuscript dated to have been written in India in the 7th century CE contained an algebraic formula for solving quadratic equations, as well as quadratic indeterminate equations (originally of type ax/c = y). Mohammad bin Musa Al-kwarismi (Persia, 9th century) developed a set of formulae that worked for positive solutions. His work was based on Brahmagupta. Abraham bar Hiyya Ha-Nasi (also known by the Latin name Savasorda) introduced the complete solution to Europe in his book Liber embadorum in the 12th century. Bhāskara II (11141185), an Indian mathematicianastronomer, gave the first general solution to the quadratic equation with two roots.[3]
The writing of the Chinese mathematician Yang Hui (1238-1298 AD) represents the first in which quadratic equations with negative coefficients of 'x' appear, although he attributes this to the earlier Liu Yi.

Derivation



The quadratic formula can be derived by the method of completing the square, so as to make use of the algebraic identity:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2+2xy+y^2 = (x+y)^2.\,\!



Dividing the quadratic equation
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): ax^2+bx+c=0 \,\!



by a (which is allowed because a is non-zero), gives:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x + \frac{c}{a}=0,\,\!



or
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2 + \frac{b}{a} x= -\frac{c}{a} \qquad (1)



The quadratic equation is now in a form in which the method of completing the square can be applied. To "complete the square" is to find some constant k such that
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2 + \frac{b}{a}x + k = x^2+2xy+y^2,\,\!



for another constant y. In order for these equations to be true,
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{b}{a} = 2y\!



or
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): y = \frac{b}{2a}\,\!


and
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): k = y^2,\,\!



thus
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): k = \frac{b^2}{4a^2}.\,\!



Adding this constant to equation (1) produces
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2+\frac{b}{a}x+\frac{b^2}{4a^2}=-\frac{c}{a}+\frac{b^2}{4a^2}.\,\!



The left side is now a perfect square because
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x^2+\frac{b}{a}x+\frac{b^2}{4a^2} = \left( x + \frac{b}{2a} \right)^2



The right side can be written as a single fraction, with common denominator 4a2. This gives
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \left(x+\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2=\frac{b^2-4ac}{4a^2}.



Taking the square root of both sides yields
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \left|x+\frac{b}{2a}\right| = \frac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac\ }}{|2a|}\Rightarrow x+\frac{b}{2a}=\pm\frac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac\ }}{2a}.



Isolating x, gives
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x=-\frac{b}{2a}\pm\frac{\sqrt{b^2-4ac\ }}{2a}=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac\ }}{2a}.



Alternative formula



In some situations it is preferable to express the roots in an alternate form.
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x =\frac{2c}{-b \mp \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }} .



This alternative requires c to be nonzero; for, if c is zero, the formula correctly gives zero as one root, but fails to give any second, non-zero root. Instead, one of the two choices for ∓ produces a division by zero, which is undefined.
The roots are the same regardless of which expression we use; the alternate form is merely an algebraic variation of the common form:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \begin{align} \frac{-b + \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }}{2a} &{}= \frac{-b + \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }}{2a} \cdot \frac{-b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }}{-b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }} \\ &{}= \frac{4ac}{2a \left ( -b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac} \right ) } \\ &{}=\frac{2c}{-b - \sqrt {b^2-4ac\ }}. \end{align}



The alternative formula can reduce loss of precision in the numerical evaluation of the roots, which may be a problem if one of the roots is much smaller than the other in absolute magnitude. The problem of c possibly being zero can be avoided by using a mixed approach:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_1 = \frac{-b - \sgn b \,\sqrt {b^2-4ac}}{2a},

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_2 = \frac{c}{ax_1}.



Here sgn denotes the sign function.

Floating point implementation



A careful floating point computer implementation differs a little from both forms to produce a robust result. Assuming the discriminant, b2−4ac, is positive and b is nonzero, the code will be something like the following.
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): t := -\tfrac12 \big( b + \sgn(b) \sqrt{b^2-4ac} \big) \,\!

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): r_{1} := t/a \,\!

Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): r_{2} := c/t \,\!



Here sgn(b) is the sign function, where sgn(b) is 1 if b is positive and −1 if b is negative; its use ensures that the quantities added are of the same sign, avoiding catastrophic cancellation. The computation of r2 uses the fact that the product of the roots is c/a.

Viète's formulas



Viète's formulas give a simple relation between the roots of a polynomial and its coefficients. In the case of the quadratic polynomial, they take the following form:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_+ + x_- = -\frac{b}{a}


and
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_+ \cdot x_- = \frac{c}{a}.



The first formula above yields a convenient expression when graphing a quadratic function. Since the graph is symmetric with respect to a vertical line through the vertex, when there are two real roots the vertex’s x-coordinate is located at the average of the roots (or intercepts). Thus the x-coordinate of the vertex is given by the expression:
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): x_V = \frac {x_+ + x_-} {2} = -\frac{b}{2a}.



The y-coordinate can be obtained by substituting the above result into the given quadratic equation, giving
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): y_V = - \frac{b^2}{4a} + c = - \frac{ b^2 - 4ac} {4a}.



Generalizations



The formula and its derivation remain correct if the coefficients a, b and c are complex numbers, or more generally members of any field whose characteristic is not 2. (In a field of characteristic 2, the element 2a is zero and it is impossible to divide by it.)
The symbol
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \pm \sqrt {b^2-4ac}



in the formula should be understood as "either of the two elements whose square is
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): b^2-4ac,\,



if such elements exist. In some fields, some elements have no square roots and some have two; only zero has just one square root, except in fields of characteristic 2. Note that even if a field does not contain a square root of some number, there is always a quadratic extension field which does, so the quadratic formula will always make sense as a formula in that extension field.

Characteristic 2



In a field of characteristic 2, the quadratic formula, which relies on 2 being a unit, does not hold. Consider the monic quadratic polynomial
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \displaystyle x^{2} + bx + c



over a field of characteristic 2. If b = 0, then the solution reduces to extracting a square root, so the solution is
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \displaystyle x = \sqrt{c}



and note that there is only one root since
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \displaystyle -\sqrt{c} = -\sqrt{c} + 2\sqrt{c} = \sqrt{c}.



In summary,
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \displaystyle x^{2} + c = (x + \sqrt{c})^{2}.



See quadratic residue for more information about extracting square roots in finite fields.
In the case that b ≠ 0, there are two distinct roots, but if the polynomial is irreducible, they cannot be expressed in terms of square roots of numbers in the coefficient field. Instead, define the 2-root R(c) of c to be a root of the polynomial x2 + x + c, an element of the splitting field of that polynomial. One verifies that R(c) + 1 is also a root. In terms of the 2-root operation, the two roots of the (non-monic) quadratic ax2 + bx + c are
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{b}{a}R\left(\frac{ac}{b^2}\right)


and
Failed to parse (Missing texvc executable; please see math/README to configure.): \frac{b}{a}\left(R\left(\frac{ac}{b^2}\right)+1\right).



For example, let a denote a multiplicative generator of the group of units of F4, the Galois field of order four (thus a and a + 1 are roots of x2 + x + 1 over F4). Because (a + 1)2 = a, a + 1 is the unique solution of the quadratic equation x2 + a = 0. On the other hand, the polynomial x + ax + 1 is irreducible over F4, but splits over F16, where it has the two roots ab and ab + a, where b is a root of x2 + x + a in F16.
This is a special case of Artin-Schreier theory.

References


  1. ^ Stillwell, John. 2004. Mathematics and its History. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag. 542 pages. p. 86
  2. ^ a b Stillwell, John. 2004. Mathematics and its History. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag. 542 pages. p. 87
  3. ^ BBC - h2g2 - The History Behind The Quadratic Formula



Book



Vedic Mathematics: Sixteen Simple Mathematical Formulae from the Vedas, by Swami Sankaracarya (1884-1960), Motilal Banarsidass Indological Publishers and Booksellers, Varnasi, India, 1965; reprinted in Delhi, India, 1975, 1978. 367 pages.

See also




External links




ca:Equació de segon grau cs:Kvadratická rovnice cy:Hafaliad cwadratig da:Andengradspolynomium de:Quadratische Gleichung et:Ruutvõrrand el:Δευτεροβάθμια εξίσωση es:Ecuación de segundo grado fr:Équation du second degré ko:이차 방정식 hi:वर्ग समीकरण io:Quadratala equaciono id:Persamaan kuadrat is:Annars stigs jafna it:Equazione di secondo grado he:משוואה ממעלה שנייה ka:კვადრატული განტოლება lt:Kvadratinė lygtis hu:Másodfokú egyenlet nl:Vierkantsvergelijking ja:二次方程式 no:Andregradsligning pl:Równanie kwadratowe pt:Equação quadrática ru:Квадратное уравнение simple:Quadratic equation sk:Kvadratická rovnica sl:Kvadratna enačba sr:Квадратна једначина fi:Toisen asteen yhtälön ratkaisukaava sv:Andragradsekvation th:สมการกำลังสอง vi:Phương trình bậc hai uk:Квадратне рівняння yi:קוואדראטישע גלייכונג
Languages
AD Links