Quine–McCluskey algorithm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
The Quine–McCluskey algorithm (or the method of prime implicants) is a method used for minimization of boolean functions which was developed by W.V. Quine and Edward J. McCluskey. It is functionally identical to Karnaugh mapping, but the tabular form makes it more efficient for use in computer algorithms, and it also gives a deterministic way to check that the minimal form of a Boolean function has been reached. It is sometimes referred to as the tabulation method. The method involves two steps:
ComplexityAlthough more practical than Karnaugh mapping when dealing with more than four variables, the Quine-McCluskey algorithm also has a limited range of use since the problem it solves is NP-hard: the runtime of the Quine-McCluskey algorithm grows exponentially with the input size. It can be shown that for a function of n variables the upper bound on the number of prime implicants is 3n/n. If n = 32 there may be over 6.5 * 1015, prime implicants. Functions with a large number of variables have to be minimized with potentially non-optimal heuristic methods, of which the Espresso heuristic logic minimizer is the de-facto world standard. ExampleStep 1: finding prime implicantsMinimizing an arbitrary function:
A B C D f
m0 0 0 0 0 0
m1 0 0 0 1 0
m2 0 0 1 0 0
m3 0 0 1 1 0
m4 0 1 0 0 1
m5 0 1 0 1 0
m6 0 1 1 0 0
m7 0 1 1 1 0
m8 1 0 0 0 1
m9 1 0 0 1 x
m10 1 0 1 0 1
m11 1 0 1 1 1
m12 1 1 0 0 1
m13 1 1 0 1 0
m14 1 1 1 0 x
m15 1 1 1 1 1
One can easily form the canonical sum of products expression from this table, simply by summing the minterms (leaving out don't-care terms) where the function evaluates to one:
Number of 1s Minterm Binary Representation
--------------------------------------------
1 m4 0100
m8 1000
--------------------------------------------
2 m9 1001
m10 1010
m12 1100
--------------------------------------------
3 m11 1011
m14 1110
--------------------------------------------
4 m15 1111
At this point, one can start combining minterms with other minterms. If two terms vary by only a single digit changing, that digit can be replaced with a dash indicating that the digit doesn't matter. Terms that can't be combined any more are marked with a "*". When going from Size 2 to Size 4, treat '-' as a third bit value. Ex: -110 and -100 or -11- can be combined, but not -110 and 011-. (Trick: Match up the '-' first.)
Number of 1s Minterm 0-Cube | Size 2 Implicants | Size 4 Implicants
------------------------------|-------------------|----------------------
1 m4 0100 | m(4,12) -100* | m(8,9,10,11) 10--*
m8 1000 | m(8,9) 100- | m(8,10,12,14) 1--0*
------------------------------| m(8,10) 10-0 |----------------------
2 m9 1001 | m(8,12) 1-00 | m(10,11,14,15) 1-1-*
m10 1010 |-------------------|
m12 1100 | m(9,11) 10-1 |
------------------------------| m(10,11) 101- |
3 m11 1011 | m(10,14) 1-10 |
m14 1110 | m(12,14) 11-0 |
------------------------------|-------------------|
4 m15 1111 | m(11,15) 1-11 |
| m(14,15) 111- |
Step 2: prime implicant chartNone of the terms can be combined any further than this, so at this point we construct an essential prime implicant table. Along the side goes the prime implicants that have just been generated, and along the top go the minterms specified earlier. The don't care terms are not placed on top - they are omitted from this section because they are not necessary inputs.
Here, each of the essential prime implicants has been starred - the second prime implicant can be 'covered' by the third and fourth, and the third prime implicant can be 'covered' by the second and first, and is thus neither an essential. If a prime implicant is essential then, as would be expected, it is necessary to include it in the minimized boolean equation. In some cases, the essential prime implicants do not cover all minterms, in which case additional procedures for chart reduction can be employed. The simplest "additional procedure" is trial and error, but a more systematic way is Petrick's Method. In the current example, the essential prime implicants do not handle all of the minterms, so, in this case, one can combine the essential implicants with one of the two non-essential ones to yield one of these two equations:
See also
External links
The R implementation is exhaustive and it offers complete and exact solutions. It processes up to 20 input variables.
es:Algoritmo Quine–McCluskey ko:퀸-매클러스키 알고리즘 it:Metodo di Quine-McCluskey ja:クワイン・マクラスキー法 pl:Metoda Quine'a-McCluskeya pt:Algoritmo de Quine-McCluskey ro:Algoritmul Quine-McCluskeyfa:الگوریتم کواین مک کلاسکی ar:اختصار التوابع المنطقية بطريقة كوين ماكلوسكي |


