The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money is a book written by the English economist John Maynard Keynes. The book, generally considered to be his magnum opus, is largely credited for creating the terminology of modern macroeconomics. Published in February 1936 it sought to bring about a revolution, commonly referred to as the "Keynesian Revolution", in the way economists thought and especially in relation to the proposition that a market economy tends naturally to restore full employment after temporary shocks. Regarded widely as the cornerstone of Keynesian thought, the book attacked the established classical economics based upon laissez-faire, and introduced important concepts such as the consumption function, the multiplier, the marginal efficiency of capital and liquidity preference. OverviewKeynes was advocating measures in a scenario of mass unemployment and widespread suffering amidst the social classes of societies around the world. While hundreds of socialites and politicians viewed the Great Depression, as well as the inability to restore confidence in markets, as the failure of capitalism on a broad base, Keynes viewed it as a narrow trouble brought about by technical problems, a "magneto trouble", as he wrote in 1930[1]. In fact, Keynes' view was that something was needed to step in the breach caused by the deficiency of demand; writing that "no obvious case is made out for a system of State Socialism which would embrace most of the economic life of the community." [2] Keynes argued that much less intrusive government expenditure policies could ensure adequate effective demand, allowing the market economy to go on as before. Unlike the Communists who believed in a full takover of the means of production by government, Keynes advocated a lesser degree of state control over the means of production. Over the seven decades since its publishing in the mid-1930s, the General Theory has shaped the views of politicians, businessmen and administrators around the world, where unbeknown to them, policies such as tax cuts to create jobs by putting spending money in people's pockets is the direct result of Keynesian doctrine. Briefly, the General Theory argued that the level of employment in a modern economy was determined by three factors: the marginal propensity to consume (the percentage of any increase in the income that people chose to spend on goods and services), the marginal efficiency of capital (the cut-off rate used to see whether investments are worthy, which are dependent on anticipated rates of return) and the rate of interest. Keynes's key arguments included the idea that in an economy bedeviled by weak demand, termed also as a depression, where in his terminology there was an ignition problem (a difficulty in getting the economy to move forward more vigorously), then the government (and more broadly the public sector) could increase aggregate demand by increasing its expenditures, including by deficit spending (borrowing to finance the expenditures), and that the public-sector borrowing would not increase prices or interest rates sufficiently to undermine the short-term effectiveness of such a policy. Although similar research was done earlier by economists such as Michał Kalecki, and Ernst Wigforss, it was Keynes' work which became the most famous. At his best Keynes was a wonderful craftsman of the English language and his fluency is in evidence all throughout the General Theory; examples of Keynes' command of the language abound in the book, for example, Chapter XII dealing with "The State of Long Term Expectation" is considered to be an example of the best writing about the stock market. However, much of the book shows Keynes at his worst, with long complicated sentences uncharacteristic of his style of writing, at least when compared to that seen in previous books and articles. The main points of the General Theory are that:
To a present day economist, the above points, except possibly the monetary supply's inability to stimulate demand, are uncontroversial and accepted; and that is what made the General Theory a breakthrough in economics, since it was this book that overthrew the established 'Treasury' view that budgets always had to be balanced, and that excessive saving harmed the economy more than it benefited it. Book I: IntroductionChapter 1: The General Theory
Chapter 2: The Postulates of the Classical Economics
Chapter 3: The Principle of Effective DemandBook II: Definitions and IdeasChapter 4: The Choice of UnitsChapter 5. Expectation as Determining Output and EmploymentChapter 6. The Definition of Income, Saving and InvestmentAppendix on User Cost Chapter 7. The Meaning of Saving and Investment Further ConsideredBook III: The Propensity to ConsumeChapter 8. The Propensity to Consume: I. The Objective FactorsChapter 9. The Propensity to Consume: II. The Subjective FactorsChapter 10. The Marginal Propensity to Consume and the Multiplier
Book IV: The Inducement to InvestChapter 11. The Marginal Efficiency of Capitalmarginal efficiancy of capital means, what output that business man get on investing any amount in his business. Chapter 12. The State of Long-term ExpectationChapter 13. The General Theory of the Rate of InterestChapter 14. The Classical Theory of the Rate of InterestAppendix on the Rate of Interest in Marshall and Ricardo Chapter 15. The Psychological and Business Incentives to LiquidityChapter 16. Sundry Observations on the Nature of CapitalChapter 17. The Essential Properties of Interest and MoneyChapter 18. The General Theory of Employment Re-statedBook V: Money-Wages and PricesChapter 19. Changes in Money-WagesAppendix on Prof. Pigou's Theory of Unemployment Chapter 20. The Employment FunctionChapter 21. The Theory of PricesBook VI: Short Notes Suggested by the General TheoryChapter 22. Notes on the Trade CycleChapter 23. Notes on Merchantilism, the Usury Laws, Stamped Money and Theories of Under-consumptionChapter 24: Concluding Notes on the Social Philosophy towards which the General Theory might Lead"It is better that a man should tyrannise over his bank balance than over his fellow citizens and whilst the former is sometimes denounced as being but a means to the latter, sometimes at least it is an alternative." "The ideas of economists and political philosophers, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of a few years back." "It is ideas, not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil." Criticisms and debateThe response to the publication of the General Theory was controversial and heavy handed, dividing economists in two camps, the young economists influenced by Keynes, and the old school economists that supported a fully free market, laissez-faire economy. From Cambridge, Keynes's students published papers and books to further the Keynesian revolution. [4] Keynes's book was largely ignored on the European continent, with the unfortunate exception of Nazi Germany, (where the translation of the General Theory was published "on paper rather better than usual, and the price not much higher than usual", as Keynes himself put it). The few reviews that actually emerged from there, particularly those by Gustav Cassel in 1937 from Sweden and Gottfried Haberler in 1936 from Austria, were hostile from their outset. In France, both the professional, as well as the personal, hostility of influential conservative economists such as Jacques Rueff guaranteed that Keynes' book would not even be translated until after the war in 1948. Keynes had forecast in the General Theory that his book was likely to lead to a revolution in the way men of affairs thought about public policy, and Keynesianism (government attempts to affect demand through fiscal policy (tax, expenditure and borrowing) and monetary policy) was enormously influential in the post-Second World War period. The stagflation of the 1970s made Keynes's interventionist approach less attractive to politicians and economic theorists.In most nations' economies it became widely accepted that Keynesian demand management was difficult, and that it had subtle damaging effects including undermining the advantages of sound finance (balanced budgets) and encouraging inflation. InfluenceDespite the adverse perceptions that grew of Keynesianism in the 1970s, it still shows up in the form of new Keynesian economics, which attempts to merge neoclassical economics with some Keynesian policy conclusions. The fear of the General Theory in America led to the delay of the study of Keynesian Economics in American classrooms. The first textbook to present Keynesianism, written by the Canadian economist Lorie Tarshis, was targeted by a right-wing campaign, which led to the cancellation of many university orders. This coordinated effort to prevent American students from learning Keynesian economics was ignored by professors at Yale University, which continued to assign the book. However, they were in turn attacked by William F. Buckley, for disseminating "evil ideas"[5] See alsoNotes
References
External links
fr:Théorie générale de l'emploi, de l'intérêt et de la monnaie gl:Teoría Xeral da Ocupación, o Xuro e o Diñeiro ko:고용·이자 및 화폐의 일반이론 it:Teoria generale dell'occupazione, dell'interesse e della moneta ja:雇用・利子および貨幣の一般理論 pl:Ogólna teoria zatrudnienia, procentu i pieniądza sk:Všeobecná teória zamestnanosti, úrokov a peňazí vi:Lý thuyết tổng quát về việc làm, lãi suất và tiền tệ | |||||||||||||||||||||||


